Fluctuating consumer demand and worldwide supply chain disruptions have affected virtually every business, regardless of industry or geography. Strategy shifts, cost savings initiatives, and alternative capital sources are just some of the ways that companies are adapting to the changing economy as a result of COVID-19. In an effort to avoid loan defaults or bankruptcy in this market environment, general partners (GPs) of private equity (PE) funds are working with portfolio company management teams to assess the liquidity position of each individual company; at the same time, they must maintain focus on their entire portfolio to ensure each investment is properly set up to meet their short- and long-term cash-flow needs.
GPs have access to certain sources of private capital that non-sponsor backed companies typically do not; however, not all forms of funding in this post-pandemic marketplace are available to PE portfolio companies in need. Once they have undertaken a thorough liquidity assessment, GPs must understand the sources of funding that are available in order to make the right funding decisions for their portfolio.
On July 4, the deadline to apply for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan was officially extended from June 30 to August 8, giving small businesses more time to obtain some of the approximately $130 billion in remaining PPP funds. These loans are generally available (with certain exceptions) to small businesses with 500 or fewer employees and are 100% forgivable as long as certain criteria are met. According to Internal Revenue Service Notice 2020-32, expenses paid with PPP loan proceeds will not be tax deductible to the extent that such amounts are forgiven under the CARES Act; however, under Section 265 of the Code, PPP loan amounts that are forgiven are considered tax-exempt income.
The SBA and Treasury released loan-level PPP data on July 6, revealing certain PE portfolio companies that have received PPP loans, despite the application of the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) affiliation rules excluding eligibility for most. The PPP is widely considered to have successfully helped small businesses in need of funding, but with the loan forgiveness period looming, recipients of PPP funds should be aware that—for many—audits are coming.
If the United States experiences a prolonged economic downturn or second wave of lockdowns, banks will become further strained, making the Fed’s promise to purchase 95% of the interest in MSLP loans from eligible lenders an economic backstop to support lending capacity.
The Main Street Lending Program (MSLP) was launched by the Federal Reserve on June 15 and broadens size eligibility for government funding to include businesses with up to 15,000 employees or $5 billion in fiscal year 2019 revenues. The MSLP has been slow to gain momentum from borrowers and lenders in its first month, but with an economy experiencing the effects of what could still be the early stages of COVID-19, and a looming presidential election, lending money holds more risk. Additionally, low interest rates have caused lenders to realize lower margins on loans that are made. If the United States experiences a prolonged economic downturn or second wave of lockdowns, banks will become further strained, making the Fed’s promise to purchase 95% of the interest in MSLP loans from eligible lenders (as long as certain criteria are met) an economic backstop to support lending capacity.
As the MSLP gets underway, PE fund and portfolio company management should be aware of some of the associated benefits and roadblocks they could face.
Various other opportunities for funding exist for PE firms and portfolio companies as well to help bridge the gap in cash needs.
In response to the economic downturn, banks are offering more deferrals and over advances on their debt issuances, as well as changes to the borrowing base. But in this evolving credit landscape with increased focus on bank balance sheets, the diligence process for borrowing businesses to receive funding is only getting more diligent and complex; if banks assess a company’s problems to be indefinite or too long-lasting, they will be less likely to expand their risk.
Debt can offer a lower cost alternative to investors than the issuance of additional equity would and doesn’t dilute LP ownership. But similar to the MSLP, adding new senior or pari passu debt risks diluting the position of existing lenders and could require their consent. There are no tax implications for receiving or repaying debt; however, interest payments are deductible as an ordinary business expense (with certain limitations).
PE dry powder was at $1.45 trillion globally as of June 2020; though, with the majority of that money tied up in newer fund vintages, structural constraints are leaving many portfolio companies of older funds in need. If a GP lacks sufficient undrawn capital commitments and reserves to fully fund the needs of its portfolio companies, there are certain equity options available to them.
In a cross-fund investment, a PE firm uses capital from a newer fund to invest in a portfolio company that is already owned by one of its older funds; however, potential conflicts of interest could arise when moving invested capital between funds. Another option is recycling earnings from a successful investment to support other companies within the same fund. Limited partners (LPs) must approve the use of capital in this way and GPs have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure each investment makes sound financial sense to their LPs. GPs can also issue preferred equity, and certain secondaries market options exist to PE funds as well. This requires buyers who are willing to put up the capital and, as many companies are learning, raising capital is a much easier task when business is good.
Shares issued and sold at fair market value is generally not a taxable event. If, though, shares are sold at less than their fair market value, the difference between the actual purchase price and fair market value of the shares may be taxable to the acquiror. Additionally, the tax consequences vary depending on the tax classification of the issuing entity. Leadership teams should understand and consider the varying tax consequences associated with issuing shares before issuing additional equity.
As merger and acquisition activity begins to pick back up in Q3, many PE firms and their portfolio companies may choose to divest noncore businesses or sell their assets in an asset sale to get an infusion of cash. PE firms may also choose to cut certain unpromising investments loose through a sale of the company, assuming a buyer exists.
In an asset sale, the seller may experience a tax disadvantage in situations where gains are treated as ordinary income, which are taxed at a higher rate than those that are treated as capital gains. In a stock sale, the seller may receive a tax advantage because equity that is sold receives capital gain treatment. All tax consequences associated with a transaction should be carefully considered and treatment may vary depending on the facts and circumstances.
As GPs and portfolio company management teams work together to identify the best source of funding to meet their needs at this crucial time, stakeholders should weigh the opportunity cost for each alternative funding option and carefully consider corporate governance requirements to ensure any actions taken are aligned.
Subscribe to Riveron Insights and get relevant news and trends shaping the world of finance, accounting, and operations.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. At nullam dignissim et facilisis ipsum volutpat dui.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. At nullam dignissim et facilisis ipsum volutpat dui. Velit eu amet odio dignissim nunc nisl.
With industry focus, speed, and agility, our interim executives help both private equity and corporate clients maintain their momentum to drive transformational change. Our professionals deliver lasting, bespoke results to achieve our clients’ goals.