40% of Companies Lack Cash Flow to Cover Interest Expense - Does This Opinion Add Up?
/Passle/66b0e16610008cf7be5e944d/SearchServiceImages/2024-11-05-15-50-10-323-672a3eb2fa0caa16109d6466.jpg)
An executive at an investment management firm is raising a red flag suggesting that private credit is overvalued, and complacency is creeping in. With fundamentals deteriorating in the most leveraged portions of the market, a PIMCO managing director recently stated investors are not being compensated enough for the risks – and provided a key stat that caught my eye:
"… 40% of the companies now have that fixed-charge coverage ratio of less than one, meaning they’re not producing enough cash flow to cover the interest expense."
I would be interested to see the data subset that was used to come to this broad conclusion. This observation (a fixed-charge coverage below one in nearly half of companies) does not align with my direct experience as a professional who works primarily with private equity portfolio companies as Interim CFO.
If someone is seeing this cash flow issue broadly (i.e., not concentrated within a specific challenged industry), connect with me, as I would enjoy a discussion on this topic.